What were the outcomes of the case Wesberry v Sanders?
Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that districts in the United States House of Representatives must be approximately equal in population.
How did wesberry versus Sanders change the makeup of Congress?
sanders change the makeup of Congress? In the Wesberry vs Sanders case, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution demands that the states draw congressional districts of substantially equal populations. Since 1910, the average number of people in a congressional district has tripled from from 210,000 to 650,000.
Which Supreme Court case outlawed racial gerrymandering?
Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in the area of redistricting and racial gerrymandering.
What was significant about the Supreme court’s decision in Gray v Sanders?
Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 (1963), was a Supreme Court of the United States case dealing with equal representation in regard to the American election system and formulated the famous “one person, one vote” standard applied in this case for “counting votes in a Democratic primary election for the nomination of a …
What was the decision in Baker v Carr quizlet?
Decision: The Warren Court reached a 6-2 verdict in favor of Baker. A lack of political question, previous court intervention in apportionment affairs and equal protection under the 14th amendment gave the court enough reason to rule on legislative apportionment. Court gained power to rule on apportionment laws.
Why do some believe equal representation in the Senate is undemocratic?
Why do some people believe the Senate is undemocratic? because the equal representation of the stats does not reflect the country’s population distribution, it represents the geological area.
What happens when Congress adjourns quizlet?
Congress adjourns, suspends until the next session, each regular session as it sees fit. If necessary, the President has the power to prorogue, or adjourn, a session, but only when the two houses cannot agree on a date for adjournment.
Why was Shaw v Reno unconstitutional?
The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.
What did Shaw v Reno do?
” In Shaw v. Reno (1993), the Court ruled that electoral districts whose boundaries cannot be explained except on the basis of race can be challenged as potential violations of the equal protection clause, and in Miller v.